On an unrelated visit to the New Zealand Registered Architect’s Board website (I have at some point, I think, declared that I will never be a Registered Architect), I was drawn to a bold Notice, which grabbed both my attention and imagination, it reads:
Annual Certificate of Registration invoices were mailed out on 15 May 2009. Payment is due by 20 June.
Please note that, despite the economic downturn, the NZRAB cannot accept payment by instalments. Architects who cannot pay should consider taking voluntary suspension. As soon as they find work again, they can revive their full registration. This is done very quickly, once payment has been received.” [NB, the cost of the ACR is $551.25]
This is obviously a horrible situation for some Registered Architects, who may be forced to suspend their registration, and risk future employment. The effects could be drastic.
After recently attending a presentation by Geoff Manaugh (of the prolific www.bldgblog.blogspot.com) I felt compelled to ponder in a speculative manner, both conservatively, and perhaps a bit radically.
The chain of effects branches out in all sorts of directions. Firstly, if the population of Registered Architects plummets, will the Registered Survivors pounce on all the Registered Work? Will the Registered Survivors (most predictably the handful of larger offices in New Zealand) gain an even greater monopoly of project procurement, escalating an already apparent homogeneity across New Zealand’s larger projects? Will larger practices cull their registrations, leaving a Grand Master Registrant to sign each project off, and might the GMR be a scapegoat, or a powerhouse?
For the Voluntarily Suspended, what will practice life be like? What might be the legal risks of a temporary sojourn from the tribe? What about having to change all your letterheads and business cards, to remove the coveted “Registered” from your professional status?
In a reverse swing of fate, will the lost fees from the Suspended cripple the NZRAB? Will architects be forced to gather in their community cliques, re-inventing new codes and costumes to signal their allegiance to the Architects Act? These factions could incite highly competitive and wonderfully innovative design practices, fighting over project as if it were the last (which it could be)…
I am in the end inconclusive about whether less Registered Architects might be a good thing, or an indifferent thing. I just haven’t met enough Registered Architects I suppose, but I feel spontaneously that I would prefer to meet the Illegal ones.