Canadian documentary ‘Examined Life’ -which I haven’t seen the full version of- features a nest of contemporary thinkers, including the occasionally controversial Slavoj Zizek. In this short clip, he puts his mind to ecological ideology, to unexpected ends, where he posits that contemporary society must infact sever its connection with Nature, and instead develop its Artificiality instead, an abstract materialism, which he then challenges to arrive at poetry, spiritualism and love, a love for Earth which embraces its flaws, and ours. Worth chatting about…
2 Responses to “Slavoj Wonders as he Wanders in the Trash”
Leave a Reply
Freerange Journal
Freerange is a regularly released online and print journal that aims to investigate the complexity of the city. Its leading proposition is that we need to keep our wits about us while doing this, living in the city is not just about understanding but engaging. We need to be wary of the 20th centuries ideologies that led us astray, and spend our energies discovering what we really value. At Freerange we think that while we grapple with the cultural and physical manifestations of our time we need to keep one piraty eye trained on what Derrida called the 'subversive intensity of existence.'-
Pages
Recent Comments
- adelaf on Archigram Archive Project might enliven Architectural speculation.
- MountainSteps on Take our jobs.org
- Dale on Cities of desire and anxiety: urban impressions from Japan
- Barnaby on Cities of desire and anxiety: urban impressions from Japan
- Dale on Freerangers do good!
- Melling Morse Architects » Tsunami Box by Gerald Melling on Tsunami Box
- Aline Muddiman on Awesome news
Tags
aid ak47 animation architecture art biology bp cactus city Climate Change design development empathy environment flash food freerange freerange nina simone michael pollard Freerange Press gardening gerald melling grease health human rights intellectual Laki language mafia McCully musclemen music NY times NZ NZRAB registered architects organic Pacific politics purpose sri lanka theatre triangulation trickster Tsunami box urban violenceBlogroll
- .7 Campaign
- 350 – Climate Action
- Architecture Centre (Wellington)
- Beyond One
- bibliodyssey
- blogcatalog
- Creative Commons
- Dead Air Space – Radiohead
- Dr Sushi
- Economy Records
- EditKid – Peter Dekkers
- Emil Mcavoy
- Freerange Baby
- G.G. MOSS
- Immanence: ecoculture, geophilosophy, mediapolitics
- KahuWork
- Natural Selection: A magazine
- point3recurring
- Public Address
- PushGraphite
- Sense about Science
- ShakeyMo Producto
- SpaceCollective
- Spartacus R
- Spatial Information Architecture Lab
- The Architecture of Fear
- The Doomsday Clock- Five 11.55
- The Oil Drum
- Tomorrowthoughtstoday
Meta


I’m down with that. Its Urbanism 101 right? Smaller, denser cities (more artificial). It’s Anti-Auckland
Interesting… I have to say it is hard to follow his logic. I like his comparison of our idealisation of nature with being in love with someone – that if you really love someone then you accept them with all their flaws and that we need to love rubbish just as much as the beautiful things in nature. For sure.
He talks about the concept of a balanced ecosystem being our contemporary religion. That we are idealising nature and not realy engaging with it.
That is fair. We should try and accept both the beauty and the challenges that come with living within an ecosystem. That doesn’t seem like a path toward artificiality…